<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: Using JonDonym&#8217;s Proxy Service for Online Privacy	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://greycoder.com/using-jondonyms-proxy-service-for-online-privacy/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://greycoder.com/using-jondonyms-proxy-service-for-online-privacy/</link>
	<description>Private Apps &#38; Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 20:11:44 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.4</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: Tracy Knauer		</title>
		<link>https://greycoder.com/using-jondonyms-proxy-service-for-online-privacy/#comment-236716</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tracy Knauer]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 01:50:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greycoder.com/?p=10213#comment-236716</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In reply to &lt;a href=&quot;https://greycoder.com/using-jondonyms-proxy-service-for-online-privacy/#comment-236713&quot;&gt;Just a guy&lt;/a&gt;.

Good point -- I think this falls under the category of pitfalls of closed-source privacy software.  The developers say the software does not route traffic through a single server.  You have to take their word for it that that is true since you can&#039;t see the code. 

There may be other ways of figuring out what happens to the traffic, such as traceroutes, without the code -- but of course those methods are not foolproof.

If JonDo does actually route traffic through multiple proxies as described, it&#039;s better than a VPN, where everything goes through a central server.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to <a href="https://greycoder.com/using-jondonyms-proxy-service-for-online-privacy/#comment-236713">Just a guy</a>.</p>
<p>Good point &#8212; I think this falls under the category of pitfalls of closed-source privacy software.  The developers say the software does not route traffic through a single server.  You have to take their word for it that that is true since you can&#8217;t see the code. </p>
<p>There may be other ways of figuring out what happens to the traffic, such as traceroutes, without the code &#8212; but of course those methods are not foolproof.</p>
<p>If JonDo does actually route traffic through multiple proxies as described, it&#8217;s better than a VPN, where everything goes through a central server.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
		<item>
		<title>
		By: Just a guy		</title>
		<link>https://greycoder.com/using-jondonyms-proxy-service-for-online-privacy/#comment-236713</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Just a guy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2015 01:00:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greycoder.com/?p=10213#comment-236713</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Honest question, how is trusting this service to route your data any different than trusting a VPN to route your data? What is stopping them from routing all traffic through a servers they control?]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Honest question, how is trusting this service to route your data any different than trusting a VPN to route your data? What is stopping them from routing all traffic through a servers they control?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: greycoder.com @ 2026-08-15 06:28:28 by W3 Total Cache
-->