<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	
	>
<channel>
	<title>
	Comments on: TextSecure Offers Encrypted Mobile Instant Messaging for Android	</title>
	<atom:link href="https://greycoder.com/textsecure-offers-encrypted-mobile-instant-messaging-for-android/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://greycoder.com/textsecure-offers-encrypted-mobile-instant-messaging-for-android/</link>
	<description>Private Apps &#38; Services</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 May 2016 22:32:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>https://wordpress.org/?v=7.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>
		By: tronado		</title>
		<link>https://greycoder.com/textsecure-offers-encrypted-mobile-instant-messaging-for-android/#comment-234488</link>

		<dc:creator><![CDATA[tronado]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2015 13:41:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.greycoder.com/?p=9904#comment-234488</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been using TextSecure for quite some time, but I switched to Threema recently. The problem with TextSecure was that many of my friends thought it was too cumbersome to use. I don&#039;t share this opinion, but I&#039;m more technically inclined than most of my friends. Threema is just as secure (maybe easier to use), and it looks more polished, so I have not problems with the switch. But TextSecure is certainly a good choice.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been using TextSecure for quite some time, but I switched to Threema recently. The problem with TextSecure was that many of my friends thought it was too cumbersome to use. I don&#8217;t share this opinion, but I&#8217;m more technically inclined than most of my friends. Threema is just as secure (maybe easier to use), and it looks more polished, so I have not problems with the switch. But TextSecure is certainly a good choice.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
		
			</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

<!--
Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: https://www.boldgrid.com/w3-total-cache/?utm_source=w3tc&utm_medium=footer_comment&utm_campaign=free_plugin

Page Caching using Disk: Enhanced 

Served from: greycoder.com @ 2026-07-10 11:13:14 by W3 Total Cache
-->